As I write this we are only three days away from Christmas Day and, in our industry anyway, many thoughts beyond that are inevitably turning to the New Year and London 2012. So it seemed entirely appropriate, for my last post of the year, to write about my belief that the Olympic Games – Summer and Winter – are a lot like Christmas.

That might sound strange to some of you, but having experienced numerous Games first hand, I can tell you that this ‘Christmas feeling’ has always been one of my overriding impressions.

There have been others of course: great sporting moments, inspiring human stories, the sheer scale of the Games, the very different experiences each host nation and city creates (good and not so good), and many more. London will give us all of these – hopefully some of the best ever.

And if you’re lucky enough to be here at Games-time, I hope you’ll get that Christmas feeling too.

A feeling of optimism and celebration; of being part of something precious and intense, very big but at the same time very personal. A feeling that, for a time at least, the world and the people in it are united and at their very best. And, once the moment has passed, the wonderful memories tinged with the sadness of knowing that you can’t get it back.

Sound familiar?

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours from myself and all at Synergy. See you in (London) 2012.

By Tim Crow on December 22nd, 2011

Tags: Default, London 2012, London 2012 sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship, Olympics, Synergy, Winter Olympics

No comments

With approximately 500 days remaining before the Opening Ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games, this is a question many are asking.  Since the Olympics were awarded to London, the London Organising Committee (LOCOG) has been moving full tilt, drawing on everything ‘London’, from the one-of-a-kind buildings to leveraging the city’s international flavour.

However, with all of this movement taking place, a certain degree of negativity and skepticism still colours public and media opinion.  Will the country who is expected to host one of the greatest Games in modern times be able to right itself in time?

This is not the first time that the International Olympic Committee has seen a country divided in its support of the Games, as negative public opinion also reigned in the lead-up to the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games. This was not simply a price tag issue, but an acute lack of confidence in the country’s overall ability to deliver on a global scale. Emerging from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, coupled with the belief that Canada was bound to be outshone by the spectacle put on for the world two years prior in Beijing, the lead up to the Games was anything but a celebration.

Unlike Canada however, the UK is acutely aware, if so desired, that they can deliver a world-class event. Less than a decade ago, in 2002, this country played host to two of the greatest and most widely publicised events in recent UK history: the Queen’s Jubilee and the Commonwealth Games in Manchester. These two globally scrutinized events were both marked by tremendous skepticism by British citizens in the months and years preceding them. There were even predictions in the media that the Queen’s Jubilee would be a ‘non-event’, and that the Commonwealth Games were nothing but a poor financial investment that would indubitably burden the local citizens.

Nonetheless, the 2002 Commonwealth Games turned out to be the largest in history at the time, and has commonly been referred to as the most successful multi-sport event to be held in the UK since the 1948 Olympics. Furthermore, the success of hosting the Commonwealth Games demonstrated to the world that the UK was more than capable of hosting events of such magnitude, and this played a significant part in securing the 2012 Olympic Games for London.

While the success of LOCOG and sponsor planning will only be truly realised when the Opening Ceremony begins on July 27th, 2012, like past Games, the present skepticism will continue to be eroded as the Games become more tangible and imminent to the public.  One key tool in rallying the nation’s support will be the Olympic Torch Relay (OTR), set to commence 70 days before the Opening Ceremonies. The OTR, which will be so far-reaching and all-encompassing that 95% of the UK will be within one hour’s drive from it, is the greatest asset of the Olympic Games to bolster support and ignite fervour and enthusiasm.

The OTR, which acts as the prelude to the Games, has the unique ability to touch people in their hometown, on their doorstep.  Local heroes will pass the Olympic Flame across the country, and overall the OTR will serve as a 70-day celebration of what and who this country is comprised of.  It will allow everyone to experience a little part of the Olympics on their own home turf, and to incite that enthusiasm and patriotism.  Just as in Canada, it was not until the flame began its journey across the country that the wave of excitement was generated and intensified, and Canadians realised the power of what they were hosting.

It may take a while yet before all the UK’s citizens come around and celebrate hosting the Games, but hopefully prior to when the Olympic Torch Relay commences.  However, if the 2010 Torch Relay throughout Canada was able to rally its 33.7 million citizens to support the 2010 Games given an even greater hurdle of public opinion, then I can only assume that the 2012 OTR will have an even greater ability to appeal to its 60+ million UK residents.

I predict that national pride will take hold and that the hearts and minds of the nation will be captured in a frenzy of patriotism. The Olympic flame will ignite a fever that will spread from coast-to-coast with the Torch Relay and we will all be smitten by the Opening Ceremony, at which point the responsibility is passed on to the athletes to show the world what they’re made of.

The eyes of the world will be upon us, as the UK prepares for perhaps the only event that can eclipse a Royal Wedding: the greatest and most successful Olympic Games in history.

By Melissa Oberman on January 27th, 2011

Tags: Beijing 2008, BOA, Commonwealth Games, London 2012, Olympic Torch Relay, Olympics, Winter Olympics

No comments

One of the many things I love about social media is the way it enables us to re-imagine how we use old media. This year I’ve seen Nike do this brilliantly twice – first in Vancouver during the Olympics, and now in Johannesburg for the World Cup – using the same technique of integrating social media with giant outdoor spectacular ads to create ‘socialised spectaculars’.

In Vancouver, as part of its ‘Force Fate’ campaign, Nike leveraged Canadian hockey fervour and its sponsorship of the Canadian hockey team, by inviting fans through Facebook to create their own inspirational ads featuring their favourite player , and then running giant projections of them onto the Sears Building on Robson Street in downtown Vancouver throughout the Olympics. Here are a couple of pictures I took of the executions.

They became a must-show for Canadian TV and a must-see, must-photograph and a  must-share for fans – Nike took pictures of the projections and sent them to the people who created them so that they could share with their friends.  Does it get any more social than that?

Four months later and 10,000 miles away in Johannesburg, Nike has repeated the trick at the World Cup as part of their ‘Write The Future’ campaign, but made it bigger in every way.

‘Write The Headline’ has global appeal by featuring Nike’s stable of football icons from around the world. The social media element is much broader too – fans can get involved through Twitter (#writethefuture), QQ (a Chinese chat programme) and Mxit (a South African IM app) as well as Facebook. And the ad is state-of-the-art – a dynamic LED installation that dominates the Southern Life building which towers over Johannesburg and can be seen for miles. Up to 100 headlines are selected each night and transformed into player animations, and when a fan’s message is used Nike sends them the animation.

Give it a try in the Write the Headline Facebook app, and check out the promo film.

By Tim Crow on June 24th, 2010

Tags: Advertising, Default, Digital marketing, Facebook, Football, Olympics, Vancouver 2010, Winter Olympics, World Cup

No comments

By Tim Crow on June 11th, 2010

Tags: Default, Digital marketing, Downloads, Facebook, Football, Football Sponsorship, New Product Development, Olympic sponsorship, Social Media, Vancouver 2010, Winter Olympics, World Cup

No comments

Yesterday, FIFA announced the stellar line-up – an array of international and African artists – for a ‘Kick-Off Celebration Concert‘ in Soweto on June 10 to mark the opening of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa. Predictably, the story generated worldwide coverage. But I couldn’t help feeling that FIFA has got its PR strategy on this wrong, and could learn something from the Olympic Games.

Shakira and Alicia Keys will help kick-off the 2010 FIFA World Cup

Back in February, I blogged from Vancouver on what a huge story the Vancouver 2010 Opening Ceremony became in the week leading up to the ceremony itself. This was because the VANOC took the opposite approach to FIFA, by deliberately not revealing details of who would be performing in the Opening Ceremony, or indeed anything about what the show would be like – which naturally generated a tidal wave of media and consumer speculation and discussion, and made the Opening Ceremony one of the most eagerly-anticipated events I’ve ever encountered.

Bryan Adams and Nelly Furtado performed “Bang the Drum” at the 2010 Winter Olympic Games opening ceremony

My mind went back to this when FIFA made their announcement yesterday, and I couldn’t help but feel that FIFA has missed a trick by announcing their line-up. Had they adopted the approach taken by VANOC, I’m sure it would have created the same level of buzz and anticipation that we saw in Vancouver – maybe even more. Sure, there will be buzz around the FIFA gig, but nowhere near as much as there would have been if we didn’t know who was going to perform.

By Tim Crow on March 18th, 2010

Tags: Football, Football Sponsorship, Music, Olympic sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship consultants, Olympics, Public relations, Vancouver 2010, Winter Olympics, World Cup

No comments

Those little red mittens came to symbolise the 2010 Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver. At $10 a pair, with half going towards Canadian athletes (though I’m not sure by which specific route), they were the must-have item for those attending the Games.

As I left the Air Canada lounge for the flight back from Vancouver last week, I fell into step behind a group of passengers who were debating the success of the mittens and what London 2012 should produce that might perform a similarly symbolic role. One of them thought it a good idea to produce a specially commissioned football shirt. I thought at the time that this was a silly idea; on reflection I think it would be borderline catastrophic. Here’s why.

The mittens performed a number of roles, some obvious and others less so, but all of which were entirely relevant to the occasion: they kept your hands wrapped in fleecy warmth; they branded the Games as they featured in their deep red multitudes in TV coverage of every Olympic event; and they allowed viewers to show their appreciation and applause for competitors as they clapped their mitten-clad hands together or held them to the sky.

I’m led to believe that the mitten is also a traditional Eskimo garment, which has positive cultural overtones relating to the native population; and they also supported a worthy cause, looked great and were priced accessibly.

Contrast these benefits with the message that a football shirt would send. It would reinforce (mostly) ill-founded foreign views of British sports fans as an ill-mannered rabble; its symbolic function is to divide us into tribes rather than unite us in support; it is unlikely to be cheap to buy; and it sure as hell won’t protect us from our weather.

I think the right souvenir garment – London’s version of Vancouver’s red mittens – is a stellar idea, but what should it be? Suggestions on a postcard please (or in the comment box below) as to what we might produce for London 2012.

By Scott Garrett on March 2nd, 2010

Tags: Advertising, Football, London 2012, London 2012 sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship, Olympics, Sales promotion, Vancouver 2010, Winter Olympics

1 comment

With the UK snowbound, it seems entirely appropriate to (b)log that the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics announced its first domestic sponsorship yesterday, a recession-busting $460m (£316m) deal in the telecommunications category with state-controlled long-distance telephone company Rostelecom and Russia’s number three mobile carrier, MegaFon.

In a departure from usual Olympic practice, the Sochi organising committee revealed the financials behind the deal – the two companies have pledged $260m (£179m) in sponsorship, plus a further $200m (£137m) to develop infrastructure in the region – thus enabling Sochi to claim early Olympic bragging rights over Beijing 2008 and London 2012 by stating that their telco sponsorship is ‘a record in Olympic history’.

Given that in its bid for the 2014 Games Sochi projected a total domestic revenue target of $350m, one can only conclude from this first deal that – perhaps deliberately? – Sochi underestimated the marketing appeal of the Games to domestic sponsors. After all, the two most recent Winter Olympics, Salt Lake 2002 and Torino 2006, raised $494m and $348m respectively from the domestic market, and Vancouver 2010 is aiming to raise $620m.

It’s also interesting to note how fast Sochi 2014 has moved by modern Olympic standards of sponsorship acquisition.  London 2012 – which set new standards for the Olympic Movement in acquiring domestic sponsors rapidly – announced its first domestic sponsorship, with Lloyds TSB, 591 days after winning the 2012 Bid. Sochi’s announcement yesterday shaves 14 days off that mark.

Recession, what recession?

By Tim Crow on February 2nd, 2009

Tags: Beijing 2008, Default, London 2012, Olympic sponsorship, Sochi 2014, Winter Olympics

No comments