Betfair is constantly pushing the envelope to find innovative ways of using their sponsorship assets. Whether that is quirky player challenges to capitalise on the sporting agenda, a ten pin bowling viral showcasing Betfair’s mobile offering (see video below), or a pioneering deal to place QR codes on GB’s beach volleyball players’ bottoms at the London 2012 Test Event, the emphasis is on doing things differently.

Bringing a fresh approach to sponsorship activation comes naturally for a company founded and driven by innovation. Another pillar of Betfair’s marketing philosophy is to ‘live and breathe social’ – as outlined by Betfair’s Head of Online Marketing, Ben Carter (@bensaint). Social is not treated as an add-on to marketing activity, but is put at the heart of campaigns. As a sponsor of Manchester United, with their 21m+ Facebook likes, it makes sense for Betfair to engage the club’s fanbase through social channels.

So what did Synergy suggest when given a couple of hours’ access to some Manchester United players on an (inevitably) wet January afternoon in Manchester? Stage a live Q&A with United players on Betfair’s Facebook page, giving fans the chance to interact with their idols by submitting questions or posting comments during the live broadcast via Facebook and Twitter.

Working alongside Betfair’s in-house production team, real-time broadcast experts Livestream, and MUTV, we helped deliver Betfair presents Man Utd live - an exclusive 30 minute programme hosted by TV presenter Rachel Brookes and featuring Michael Carrick, Ashley Young and Nani. Supporters were able to watch the action by simply ‘liking’ the Betfair Facebook page, and could submit questions or comments by tweeting @BetfairSports with the #MUlive hashtag.

Once again, doing things differently paid off. Over 40,000 people tuned in to watch, close to 1,000 questions were received during the broadcast, and tweets of the #MULive hashtag reached over 3.8 million people (source: Tweetreach).  Synergy’s PR team managed the external pre-promotion through football blogs and forums, and the post-event syndication of content and quotes to key media targets, resulting in over 100 pieces of online coverage. Quotes featured in three national print newspapers, and branded footage was included in ITV Granada Reports in the build up to the weekend’s game against Arsenal.

What else did we learn from our inaugural live interactive Facebook broadcast? For a start that Nani regularly gets the hairdryer treatment from Sir Alex. For more insights, you’ll have to watch the webcast for yourself….

By Tom Gladstone on January 25th, 2012

Tags: Betfair, Default, Facebook, Football, Manchester United, Sponsorship, Synergy

No comments

At the end of last year Synergy worked with Sky to launch the Sky Sports Scholarships. This programme supports some of Britain and Ireland’s most exciting athletes to help them fulfil their potential on the international stage and prepare them for life in the spotlight. Sky will tell the athletes’ stories through Sky Sports channels to build their profiles, engage its customers and inspire the stars of the future. Details of each of the athletes and the support Sky is providing can be found here.

Sky have been one of the leading investors in Sport in UK and Ireland for the past 20 years – not only through their broadcasts, but also through programmes like British Cycling, Sky Sports Living for Sport and the ECB Coach Education Programme. Sky Sports Scholarships extends this support to individual athletes, providing them with crucial funding (helping to cover the costs of coaching, training and competition), valuable mentoring support and media relations advice from Sky Sports News talent.

Eight of the 11 athletes were welcomed at Sky Studios on 2nd November for the announcement of Sky Sports Scholarships. The athletes completed live interviews on Sky Sports News, web-chats, green-screen filming as well as camera and social media training and a chance to meet their Sky Sports News mentor.  To see behind the scenes footage and more information about the Sky Sports Scholarships click here.

Having been so closely involved since the very beginning of the programme (working up the campaign strategy, developing the brand messaging, identifying the right athletes, negotiating the contracts, creating the activation strategy and managing all the logistics), it was great to see it finally ‘go live’.  And it is just the start of an exciting new component of Sky’s long term commitment to improving sport in the UK and Ireland at every level.

By Lisa Parfitt on January 25th, 2012

Tags: Content, London 2012, Sponsorship, Synergy

No comments

Last Friday, The Times published an article by Olympics Correspondent Ashling O’Connor with major implications for how London 2012 will come to be viewed and, going forward, for the value to brands of grassroots sports sponsorship and marketing in the UK.

Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt. Photograph Tim Ireland/PA.

Headlined ’2012 legacy plan for a fitter Britain is quietly scrapped’ and substantiated by an exclusive interview with Olympics Secretary Jeremy Hunt, it began:

One of the key promises that helped London to win the right to host the 2012 Olympics is being quietly scrapped by ministers because Britons are stubbornly resisting efforts to get them playing more sport. When Lord Coe gave his inspirational speech to persuade IOC members to being the Games to Britain, he spoke of the events legacy in inspiring people to play sport. But the numbers taking part in grassroots sport have slipped back and ministers now admit that there is no chance of hitting the target of getting two million more people active by 2013. The target will now be axed in favour of a “payment by results” system that will penalise sports that fail to engage with young people.

Neither the Olympics failing to inspire the inactive to take up sport, nor the targets being scrapped, should come as any surprise.

In the case of the latter, this has been widely expected, based on the decline in sports participation in the last five years, which has seen only four sports gain new participants and 17 lose ground, and on the extensive briefings (with very different motives) given recently by Messrs Robertson and Jowell.

In the case of the former, it is a fact that no modern Olympics has driven an increase in sports participation in a host country, with evidence pointing to the fact that the Games simply inspires people who are already active to become even more active, and that the biggest contributory factor worldwide to the failure to engage the inactive is flawed strategy at state and sport governing body level.

On which point, expect all this to become a seriously political hot potato as we move through and beyond the Games, when the analysis of whether London 2012 has delivered on its legacy promises – already generating its fair share of media attention – moves firmly centre-stage, with sports participation in a starring role.

But beyond the Games, in the same Times article Jeremy Hunt signalled a shift in Government policy, to be announced next month, that has important consequences for brands investing in grassroots sport. Again, I quote from the piece:

The success of UK Sport…has shaped the shift. After its “no compromise” model, 46 sports governing bodies will receive money based only on their ability to attract and retain 14 to 25-year-olds. From 2013, more than half their funding will depend on their success, reviewed annually at three stages: 16, 18 and 25-year-olds. Sports that fail will have their money deducted…[Hunt said] “We are learning from the success of UK Sport…and moving to a payment-by-results system…[sports] shouldn’t expect funding unless they are delivering on targets.”

This is good news for brands investing in grassroots sport sponsorship, whether directly or as a component of a wider investment in a sport asset. In order to maintain and increase their state funding, sports governing bodies will have to be much more focused on creating and delivering grassroots programmes that demonstrably engage and recruit new young players.

That will need both more effective marketing, and more results-focused marketing. And with the greatest respect to most sports governing bodies, federations and teams, that’s something that brands – who already live and die by their ability to acquire and retain new customers – are much better at.

So I’m hoping this ushers in a new era where sports governing bodies become more focused on tapping into the marketing expertise of brands – especially youth-oriented brands – and much less focused on treating brands as banks to fund grass roots programmes that, plainly, aren’t working.

By Tim Crow on December 7th, 2011

Tags: Brand marketing, Default, grass roots sport, London 2012, Olympics, Politics, Sponsorship

No comments

It’s been an exciting period for the RBS team here at Synergy, with a roadshow tour that has brought Judy Murray’s Set4Sport initiative to life for parents and children all over the UK. Created by Judy Murray and supported by RBS, Set4Sport is a programme inspired by Judy’s years of experience as a tennis coach and parent, which showcases easy and accessible ways for parents to play with their children and develop the skills required for playing sport. The activities featured are based on the games Judy played with her sons Andy and Jamie when they were growing up, and can easily be recreated at home using everyday items.

At its core, Set4Sport is all about helping parents to find active ways to play with their children, and it has been really inspirational to be part of a programme that will make a tangible difference to how children develop sporting skills. Judy’s own games such as “Jumping the River” and “Double Trouble” not only give parents a fantastic example of an activity they can replicate in their own homes or back garden, but also spark off their imagination to help them create games of their very own.

In June, Synergy managed the programme media launch with Andy, Jamie and Judy Murray, raising awareness of the free Set4Sport book and website. The next stage of the roll-out saw a series of roadshow events showcasing many of the suggested games and ideas. So off we headed, on a journey that took us to communities throughout England, Scotland and Wales.

To date, we have hit six venues, starting with a rainy South Shields in August, and most recently visiting Glasgow’s Riverside Museum on a chilly day in late October. The events have proven a big success, with Judy Murray present at each location, and hundreds of families descending en masse to get their fill of the Set4Sport action.

Synergy embarked on an awareness-driving PR campaign, with the aim to boost attendance at the different roadshow events up and down the country. Ahead of each event, Judy was on hand to speak to local newspapers and radio, building up buzz and excitement prior to the roadshow coming to town. As well as in-depth Set4Sport campaign features with national media, Synergy also proactively targeted press event listings and local “days out” guides, helping to generate strong numbers at each location.

For each location, Synergy identified an area of high footfall specifically positioned to attract young families to a free event, with Judy and her team of coaches setting up a number of different game stations. Prime venues were secured including Brighton Beach, Manchester’s Museum of Science and Industry (MOSI), and the Riverside Museum in Glasgow, all free facilities packed with families during the summer and half-term holidays. After registering their details, parents and children worked their way around up to eight different game rotations, all designed to develop skills in agility, balance and co-ordination, as well as being great fun!

On February 11th the show returns to Scotland, as the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh plays host to an event during the half term holiday. For more information on Set4sport, stay tuned to www.Set4Sport.com and Facebook.

By Donald Parish on December 6th, 2011

Tags: Andy Murray, Default, grass roots sport, Sponsorship, Synergy, Tennis

No comments

I was in Auckland with the British and Irish Lions when London was awarded the 2012 Olympic Games. Very excited, my first thought was ‘how can I get involved’?

Roll on two years and my excitement grew when I filled in my volunteer form. After working at Synergy for nearly 30 years and with an employment history of running media offices in a number of different sports, I assumed – wrongly as it turned out – that I would be an ideal volunteer to work in one of the many media centres.

Over the next nine months I continued to receive emails from the LOCOG Games Maker programme saying I hadn’t been forgotten but on the other hand I hadn’t been chosen…

Suddenly, three weeks ago, I received an email saying my application had been reconsidered and could I come in for an interview – not for the media centre but instead the Spectator Entry Team!  Still keen to be involved, I rang up and booked my interview time.

So it was that last Friday I found myself heading towards LOCOG’s offices in Canary Wharf to attend my interview.  A group of us sat waiting – about 12 in total – representing a cross-section of London society.

Escorted to the office, the group was full of questions and we were given an outline of the role for which we were being interviewed – in short, we would be ambassadors outside the venues helping spectators with information and also ‘providing entertainment’ if the security queues got too long.  Not quite sure what he meant by that, but it certainly was a worry when we were told that it might take an hour and half to get through security into the venue…it might need a little bit more than us entertaining them with that wait!

We moved on to have our ID checked and our photo taken – in case we are chosen – and were then taken into a holding area full of information about 2012.

Next stop a cinema to watch a short film on the programme – with sweets provided by a nice man from Cadbury and clear mention of our training was being provided by McDonald’s – which constituted a very funny to camera piece from Eddie Izzard. Then the interview…

The interviewer assured us that this would be very informal, asking us the following questions: what is your favourite Olympic memory (I chose Steve Redgrave winning his fifth Gold medal); why do you think you can do the role (given that we had only been told what it was 10 minutes earlier, there was a need to think quickly); how many days can you commit to, etc.

My favourite Olympic memory

With the interview over, we headed down towards the Tube, and I discovered that I was not the only person that hadn’t been selected when their experience might be best-suited…there was a doctor (who had ticked the ‘Medical’ box) and two other media officers (who had ticked the ‘Media’ box).  Most interestingly there was the guy who had researched Boris Johnson’s background for ‘Who do you think you are?’ – I am not sure which box he’d ticked though!

So I am now waiting to see whether I have been chosen and if so to which venue…perhaps it will be Lord’s which is only five minutes from my house and I know like the back of my hand having worked there for various sponsors over the past 20 years – just please don’t  give me Wembley!

Stay tuned for the next update…

By Fiona Foster on November 18th, 2011

Tags: Default, London 2012 sponsorship, London 2012 sponsorship consultants, Olympic sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship consultants, Olympics, Sponsorship, Sport, Synergy, Team GB

2 comments

When Chelsea announced they were looking for a naming rights sponsor for Stamford Bridge earlier this week, I tweeted that I would advise brands to avoid naming rights sponsorships of an existing stadium like Stamford Bridge, because they don’t work with the media [who won’t use the sponsor’s name] or the fans [who don’t like a sponsor re-branding ‘their’ stadium].
 
This principle is the second of my Five Golden Rules Of Naming Rights For Brands, which visitors to this parish will recall I last dusted off back in July.

Cue quite a response from the blogosphere, pointing out that O2 successfully re-named an existing arena, the Millennium Dome.

Does this render my second rule invalid? Well, no actually. To me The O2 and another recent deal are actually the exceptions that prove the rule.

But I admit that it does mean a re-think of the rules. And I’ve come to the conclusion that a new one is needed.
 
Based on the success (in branding terms) of The O2 and the Aviva Stadium in Dublin (re-built on the site of the decrepit and ultimately unloved Lansdowne Road) it’s clear that it is possible to successfully brand an existing stadium under certain conditions: those conditions being when the stadium involved is unloved and/or decrepit, and as a result is going to be re-built and/or re-launched.

So, for the very first time, I give you a modified second rule and a new third rule, to create a new list of six.

1. The stadium must have only one short name. If there are two names, one of which is the sponsor’s, guess which one the media, and the fans, will edit out? ‘The Reebok Stadium’ works: so does ‘The Emirates’. Conversely, horrors like ‘Sports Direct.com@St James’ Park’ always quite deservedly bomb. 

2.  Avoid re-naming an existing stadium with heritage. If you do, you run the risk of being edited out (The Oval) or the object of acrimony (SportsDirect.com@St James’ Park). It’s much easier to start with the blank canvas of a new stadium. But don’t forget to follow rule number one.

3. The exception to this is when a stadium or arena is unloved and/or decrepit and as a result is going to be re-built and/or re-launched – for example the way the Millennium Dome became The O2 and Lansdowne Road became the Aviva Stadium.  But again, don’t forget to follow rule number one. 

4. You must pay enough. There was an outcry in Leicester against Walker’s – previously a relatively popular local employer – when it was announced that the company had paid only £150,000 per year for 10 years to sponsor the new Leicester City Stadium. This was unfavourably compared with the millions the company had spent using Gary Lineker in its TV advertising.

5. You must be in it for the long term, for two reasons: to demonstrate your commitment (see also rule number four) and also because if you do it for long enough, the return on investment in terms of media impressions alone will be enormous – as long as you’ve followed rule number one.

6. Once you’ve followed rules 1-5, the hard work really starts – gaining the respect and admiration of the fans and the media for what you’re doing.

So, there they are. The new Six Golden Rules Of Naming Rights For Brands. Let me know what you think.

And before you ask, yes I am wondering whether the Etihad deal with Manchester City to re-name Eastlands might create a seventh, where it is also possible to re-name a stadium with, let us say, no heritage. But let’s wait and see how that one plays out first.

By Tim Crow on November 9th, 2011

Tags: Default, Naming Rights, Sponsorship

9 comments

Ssshhh… we have something you might like to know about, but you have to promise not to tell anyone. It’s a secret, OK?

A 1920s cinematic speakeasy has landed in the heart of Soho, just in time for the BFI London Film Festival. The Jameson Apartment provides an unforgettable experience in a pop-up style vintage bar hidden away on the top floor of Kettners. Complete with a discreet entrance, a real life ‘Dandy’ and tantalising cocktails, the Jameson Apartment is the perfect hideaway for a nostalgic evening with friends. 

In order to gain entry to the Jameson Apartment you will need to first obtain the secret password, and on arrival remember to relay this to our Dandy who will be waiting for your call.

Log on to www.jamesoncultfilmclub.com and all will be revealed!

Ssshhh… please don’t tell.

By Francesca Gamble on October 21st, 2011

Tags: Alcohol, Public relations, Sponsorship, Synergy

No comments

Content forms an integral part of our work; understanding the factors regarding emotional and intellectual engagement with an audience are important in order to create meaningful experiences. The aim of this article is to trace the evolution of content creation and delivery in light of advances in technology and changes in social activities; hopefully giving some useful insight into options we have for our clients when planning campaigns.

“My biggest competitor today is someone with an idea”

Nabil Sakkab – Head of Research & Development, Procter & Gamble.

TV Content

In the days when the only mass media was broadcast and print, content producers had a one-way channel to engage their audience.

Typically, audiences respond best to content that carries authority (from factually trusted sources such as the Government) or authenticity (content that connects through personal or social relevance).

Successful TV has both authority and authenticity and the really successful ones are memorable – generally through well-executed, great ideas that appeal to the emotions (through shock or comedy).

A good example is Keira Knightley’s Women’s Aid commercial:

The production values are high, the storyline is strong and the effect of the film is to shock; but if we do not remember the website listed at the end, once the ad finishes we are left shocked but no longer engaged.

Internet content

With the arrival of YouTube came Manic Dog, Mystic Cat and endless wedding carnage videos. However, once TV producers started to talk with web developers (with the aid of a translation service) the result was a subtle shift in the style and format of programmes.

Interactive software has enabled content producers to give audiences a different experience; multi-layered options in story, format and delivery that no longer depend on high production values but instead rely on engagement through information and choices.

The Government anti-knife crime video campaign, ‘Choose a Different Ending’, is a good example of informed choice given to an audience:

Due to the interactive nature of the viral video, the user/target audience is forced to think about knife crime and the choices they are being asked to make. Each decision is then brought to life in the video, offering an insight into the consequences of carrying a knife. This is a good example of a campaign initiative that can only work online, as it relies on audience interaction.

The video engages the target audience in several ways:

- It is shot from an individual perspective i.e. the player sees the world through the eyes of one person

- It is shot on a council estate and then in the surrounding areas (park, nearby roads), so that the location is a familiar one to the target audience

- The cast is formed of the target audience, ensuring that the language and dress code would also be recognised by this audience

- The video was created with the aid of the target audience which helps with authenticity

Paid, owned and earned

For a while we settled into the comfort of three areas where content would be delivered and debated:

• Paid: TV commercials
• Earned: Comments on a YouTube video
• Owned: A company’s website

 

Of these three areas, earned has proven to be the most valuable as it carries authenticity through endorsement from peers.

Once hit counts and comments turned into real currency, producers soon realised that success with the audience required more than simply being in the same space, even if the content was clever or well-produced. It became clear that the appropriate tone, language and social context were essential for success.

Take the Government swine-flu film, 2009:

This was a TV ad that was also delivered and promoted online, receiving a whopping 380 hits on YouTube. The ‘Catch it Bin it Kill it’ message was generally dismissed as something for other people (perhaps the penalty for wearing bad jumpers in lifts).

The Government then commissioned a viral video to deliberately spoof the official one, involving actors from the target demographic and contemporary music. The result is much more fun.

Same message; different style (smaller budget); 1 million hits on YouTube. Enough said.

How we consume media

Almost more important to ‘where’ people are watching their videos is ‘how’ people are watching them.  This has an effect on the creative and production process.

Viewing habits can be grouped into three main types of activity:

- Snippets (spontaneous media activity)

- Boutique (speciality media searches)

- Catch-up (fitting TV schedules around our own lives)

A recent survey of 1,300 mobile Internet users below the age of 25, showed that most use a mobile device to talk to friends about the show they are watching, a trend known as ‘Social TV’.

Social media

Social media has altered the definitions of paid, earned and owned media or at least has blurred the lines between them. Now, the challenge that agencies face is figuring out how to integrate all three forms of media for maximum effect.

After all, social content, by definition, can lack authority but it has authenticity because it establishes relevance and context with our friends and our surroundings.

Let’s have a diagram.

Sponsorship events

We know there are Fans (consumers) who have Passions (Sport, Music, Art). Sponsored activities provide the magical third piece of the puzzle – the Location. This is not just the location of the event, but, thanks to mobile phones, the location of fans too. And this is powerful intelligence regarding media capture and distribution options.

Radiohead’s concert video shot in Prague in 2009 by 50 fans on Flip cameras makes you feel like you are standing amongst the crowd:

It appeals to fans because it was made by fans, contains fans and gives the fans that couldn’t go the feeling that they were there.

And the effects go beyond the concert. The video was endorsed and published by the band; further projects have been planned by the fans that in turn become a part of the history of the band, strengthening the relationship between all concerned.

The Social challenge – the media ecosystem

The goal is to connect the dots and integrate all media for maximum results.

It is not just about producing content for an event or campaign but to inspire the target audience to contribute, to collaborate and comment beyond the life of the event.

The media can take on a life of its own, especially if there are core community and social values – a mini ecosystem that can run beyond the campaign.

Mobile

Mobile is ever-increasingly becoming the medium of choice, particularly for image capture and Geo-positioning. According to Comscore, in the next 12 months:

‘We predict more than half of all mobile consumers will have access to mobile media, largely driven by growing adoption of smartphones. Identifying the synergies that exist between all consumer touch points – traditional PC internet, mobile media (via app and browser), tablets, etc. – and understanding how consumers use these devices to fulfil different needs and convenience levels will be of critical importance to marketers.’

How does all this affect production for Synergy Clients?

Social / mobile media is very powerful but it often requires a paid spark.

Synergy already produces world-class output and my goal is to bring broadcast, online and social production and planning experience into close proximity with the Synergy team and clients hopefully resulting in:

- Real-time intelligence on media options available

- Advice on production and delivery techniques, and suppliers to maximize creative impact

- Guidance on delivery options, channels, asset management (now and future) and measurability. If they are managed, assets can be re-purposed, like this COI text driving radio ad that was repurposed (very cost-effectively) as a viral video simply by adding graphics

Here is fifteen years of TV and web production distilled into my simple media AIM chart:

In Summary

- Content has developed from a one-way communication to an interactive conversation endorsed and measured through social reference

- The balance  of emotional, intellectual and social engagement should be carefully planned depending on the target audience and mediums available

- Technology and innovation drive the reach of our work but synergy between content producers and audiences fuels its impact

By Colin Burgess on October 13th, 2011

Tags: Advertising, Alcohol, Branded content, Celebrity, community, Content, Default, Digital marketing, Facebook, Media, Sponsorship, Synergy, Synopsis, Television, Viral Marketing, YouTube

No comments

What happened?

Online fashion retailer ASOS has continued its pioneering digital approach by utilising urban culture to promote its new 2011 Autumn/Winter menswear collection.

Through a new online experience, the ASOS Urban Tour uses an interactive platform to showcase its latest range, by zooming in on a variety of street performers including skaters, dancers and musicians, in five of the most stylish cities across the globe: London, Paris, Berlin, Los Angeles and New York.

Through an interactive scrolling map, similar to Google Earth, the application starts with a bird’s eye view of the globe and then zooms into the streets within your chosen city. The real funs starts when you click on any of the dancers, skaters or musicians who then start to perform. The interactive videos offer links for each of the performers and enable the user to see what they are wearing and how to purchase it.

Why we love it

Marketing something as personal and tactile as clothes in a two-dimensional online environment will always be a challenge. But ASOS continue to develop and push the boundaries, using engaging and innovative methods to showcase its clothing ‘in action’. This cutting-edge campaign, which combines lifestyle aspirations and fashion, represents a natural progression from the successfully executed online catwalk concept.

Research undertaken indicates that male consumers being targeted by ASOS are influenced in their fashion choices by what they see being worn on the streets, and therefore partnering with inspirational urban talent offers a fresh and relevant approach for the online retailer.

Urban Tour has been supported with extensive social media presence via the official ASOS Facebook page which currently boasts over one million ‘likes’. Inter-city rivalry has been utilised to spark conversation via an online poll, simply asking fans which city is their favourite – London currently sits at the top with 1,381 of the 2,895 votes. Fashion bloggers globally have been going crazy for this ‘mind blowing’ digital offering, describing it as an “entirely fresh and truly incredible experience.” So for those of you fashion-conscious men not making it to any London Fashion Week shows, I suggest you get your fix of urban style here!

By Emily Waring on October 13th, 2011

Tags: Advertising, Branded content, community, Default, Facebook, Fashion, Social Media, Sponsorship, Sport, Synergy, Synergy Loves, Synopsis, Television, The Arts, Viral Marketing

No comments

Think of any brand associated with an athlete, and in most cases the brand will have approached the athlete as a result of the athlete’s brand/consumer fit and will be paying them a hefty sponsorship fee in return for a number of rights.

In “What We Love” this month though, we explore a brand who took a much more innovative and engaging approach to sponsorship by inviting a number of athletes to compete for a sponsorship contract, with their consumers ultimately choosing the winning athlete.

So who is the brand and what did they do?

In March this year, Sony Ericsson – a long time supporter of women’s tennis – launched a new format entertainment show, “Xperia Hotshots,” which followed the lives of six globetrotting, aspiring stars of the WTA, all of whom were competing for a sponsorship contract from Sony Ericsson.

The competition centred around the online buzz each tennis star could generate for themselves, with the player receiving the most number of votes on the official Sony Ericsson Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/xperiahotshots) receiving €100,000 of support from the brand.

In order to help with the challenge, Sony Ericsson gave the players exclusive access to major music, film and fashion events as they toured the globe playing tennis. The players were also able to use their own stardom and contacts to aid them in generating the most interesting content, as long as it was shared via social network sites using the Xperia handsets that were given to the stars.

As an extra incentive for fans to get involved and follow the series, all of those who “Liked” the ‘Hotshots’ Facebook page were also entered into a prize draw to win tickets to the Sony Ericsson Open in Miami

Over the course of the campaign, which ended on 5 September and was won by Wimbledon Semi-Finalist Sabine Lisicki, the competition generated huge awareness for Sony Ericsson including 820,000 friends on Facebook; 3 Million video views on YouTube; 100,000 mobile app downloads; 1,200 pieces of media coverage; 70 videos produced; and 530 hours of footage shot.

Why we love it

We love this campaign here at Synergy for several reasons. Firstly, by prescribing that the players must use their Sony Ericsson Xperia Android touch smartphones to communicate with their fans through Social media, Sony Ericsson were able to showcase the product’s unique features in real life situations, thereby providing consumers with a much better understanding of its unique selling points, benefits and potential usage occasions.

Secondly, by focusing on the use of the phone for entertainment purposes and social media (as opposed to purely a communication device) the perception of Sony Ericsson as THE communication entertainment brand was greatly enhance.

Thirdly, by engaging fans in the athlete selection process, Sony Ericsson were able to generate a much deeper bond between their potential consumers and the ultimate Ambassador than if the athlete were contracted behind closed doors, and fans who engaged in the voting process are now more likely to follow that athlete going forwards than if the athlete had been selected on the basis of whom the marketers thought would offer the best brand/consumer fit.

Finally, by profiling six players, Sony Ericsson very cleverly linked themselves to all of these world-class athletes when they only contracted one; six great brand endorsements for the price one . . . not bad going!

By Liz Brown on October 13th, 2011

Tags: Blogging, Brand marketing, Celebrity, Communications, Default, Facebook, Media, Mobile, Online communities, Sponsorship, Sport, Synergy Loves, Synopsis, Tennis, Viral Marketing, YouTube

No comments