I’m saddened but not surprised by the IOC decision to limit Torch Relays to host countries. It was both predictable, following the anti-China protests that dogged the 2008 Torch Relay, and pragmatic, given the volatile political climate. But I believe it’s a backward step for the Olympics which could have been avoided.

The problem with the 2008 Torch Relay was that it was an overtly Chinese Torch Relay, not an Olympic Torch Relay. As such it ran counter to the DNA of the Olympics, which is a celebration of humanity – of the many, not the few, and of all countries, not simply the host.

Call me an idealist if you will, but surely it would be both preferable and possible to preserve the international leg by re-designing the Torch Relay experience so that it both reflects this true Olympic DNA, and in so doing eschews nationalism?

I guess I shouldn’t complain, in that we’ll have the Torch all to ourselves in here in the UK in advance of London 2012. But I can’t help feeling that the Torch could and should be used experientially to share the true spirit of the Olympic Games with the world.

By Tim Crow on March 30th, 2009

Tags: Default, Experiential marketing, London 2012, London 2012 sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship, Olympic Torch Relay

Tweet