‘Revolutions are not about trifles, but they spring from trifles’
Aristotle

Ukraine v England. A nothing match? Yes – we’d already qualified for the World Cup. A sports broadcasting revolution? No – simply another glimpse of a revolution that’s already here.

This is not to downplay the significance of the match as an online pay-per-view event of course. Even with only a reported 250,000-300,000 online pay-per-view subscribers, it’s the most watched “internet-only” football match in history – the concensus being that the previous record was set by Manchester City’s friendly against Barcelona on August 19, which was available free in the UK only on City’s website, where 95,000 fans clicked in.

But make no mistake: live streaming of major sports events is already with us. During last year’s Beijing Olympics, BBC Sport served 40 million UK requests for online video streams and 11.8 million viewers used the red button during the Games; hundreds of thousands of UK consumers regularly stream live global sports every month through various sites; and niche sports, extreme sports and gaming are routinely streamed online due to the lack of mainstream broadcast distribution opportunities.

As webcasting grows in capacity and audience, it’s inevitable that more events will be streamed online. Computers and portable devices are simply alternative screens, and are converging quickly. Once TV sets are broadband-enabled the role of the internet won’t matter. Viewers won’t care how the match is getting to their screens – it’s all ‘TV’. It’s just that the notion and experience of ‘TV’ is going to change.

But only slowly of course. Saturday’s match proved that internet-only ppv is still in a contentious infancy when it comes to marquee events, and that the traditional broadcasters will not be usurped as the main distributors of big-ticket sport anytime soon.  QED: if England had still needed points against Ukraine, the game would have been bought by one of the big TV names for millions.

But we’ve seen a glimpse of the future. Remember when Sky first came along?

‘The future is already here, it is just not evenly distributed.’
William Gibson

By Tim Crow on October 12th, 2009

Tags: Default, Football, Media

No comments

@synergytim tweeted this morning about a music download service soon to be launched by Sky. Sky Tunes, it says here, will take on iTunes and offer a bona fide alternative in the music download market which is to say these days, the music market per se. It’s the second such service to have crossed my bows in as many weeks, the first having been brought to my attention my my 11-year-old daughter Maddie who received what she perceived to be a genuine offer of free music from her mobile provider, Vodafone. Being the sensible girl that she is (she gets it from her mother) she first checked with me to see if it was OK to reply “yes” to Vodafone’s text and receive 10 tracks of her choice, for free.

I checked it out to find that had she done so, she would have been able to choose her 10 tracks from the UK top 50-ish, and then would have committed with no further action on her part, to a monthly subscription of £5 added to her mobile bill, for which she would have received a further 10 tracks and “the option to buy loads more”. Dangerous stuff when you’re 11 years old and Daddy pays your phone bill, so we declined to proceed.

@synergytim’s tweet reminded me of this today, as I checked out Sky’s service as described in The Guardian, finding that for a monthly subscription of £7.99 I could receive 10 tunes or an album each month. Pricier than the Vodafone service and with no apparent differential benefit.

If I understand these services correctly, I believe that in both cases should I neglect to choose tracks or albums or if I forget, the service provider will choose my music for me. How kind.

Digital natives will be too young to remember a company called Britannia Music, but migrants may recall how in the 1970s and 80s, members of the Britannia Music club, snared by the offer of four albums for £1 each, then paid about £5 per month to the club, for which they received the Britannia Music-selected “Album of the Month” in their chosen format: LP, cassette or 8-track (this last is a dimly recalled format from my pre-school days, I assure you). The entire catalogue of Britannia Music was available for purchase at full or discounted prices. Funny, but all the stuff I listened to always seemed to be full price.

Sky Tunes and the Vodafone Music Club use similar mechanics to the old Britannia Music club, adapted for the digital age. Having wasted my hard-earned pocket money as a teenager on Kirsty MacColl’s Desperate Character and Witchfynde’s appalling debut Give ‘Em Hell, I want to warn all you young folk out there that there is a better, more transparent way of buying music. It’s called iTunes and whilst I welcome competition in the free market, the above two examples are not it because they are fundamentally not transparent. Not honest, even.

These lock-you-in-to-a-punitive-contract music supply services are not new and offer nothing that can not be obtained for similar prices or cheaper elsewhere.  The Guardian points out two added benefits of the Sky service: first, that its tracks come DRM-free and can be played on any MP3 player whereas iTunes tracks require an iPod. With iPods dominating the personal music scene to as great a degree as Microsoft dominates the personal computer OS market, this seems a dubious benefit. And second: Sky offers unlimited streaming for free, which is nice, but I get that anyway via Last.fm and Spotify. I have done so for months.

And where do I listen to these free music services? On my iPhone and iPod, of course.

By Scott Garrett on October 12th, 2009

Tags: Default, Digital marketing, Downloads, Music, New Product Development

No comments

This week’s PR Week features Synergy and the Betfair FanvFan Ashes campaign.  To read more, click here.

By Synergy on October 8th, 2009

Tags: Press Clipping

No comments

Dominic Curran comments in Sport Business International on how the mobile phone app phenomenon will affect the sports marketing industry.  To read the article, click here.

By Synergy on October 8th, 2009

Tags: Press Clipping

No comments

Scott Garrett comments in Marketing on potential solutions to the brand and business challenges facing Formula One as the sport reels from yet another scandal.

To read the article, click here.

By Synergy on October 8th, 2009

Tags: Press Clipping

No comments

Visitors to these pages will know that since questioning Andy Burnham’s now-infamous Medal Hopes announcement last year, I’ve written several posts on the issue’s evolution. So, with Team 2012 having risen last week like a phoenix from the ashes of Medal Hopes, it seems only appropriate to mark the issue’s apparent resolution with a few observations.

1. Team 2012 should not have been necessary

Let’s remember that the budget problem Team 2012 is designed to help solve was created by the Treasury in 2006. Let’s also remember that the problem was then exacerbated by two years of DCMS inaction, and finally exploded by the obvious flaws in Fast Track’s Medal Hopes ‘plan’ – memorably described by the BBC’s Matt Slater (author of a number of excellent blogs on the subject) as being ‘up there with Baldrick’s finest’. Quite a contrast with the Vancouver 2010 Own The Podium programme, launched in 2005 with adequate national and regional Government funding and a joined-up long-term plan.

2. The launch of Team 2012 is a triumph for LOCOG and UK Sport

Given the mess they inherited from DCMS and Fast Track, this is indisputable. Consider the list of their achievements: uniting the various stakeholders; creating a new property; resolving (apparently) the incendiary issue of elite Olympic athletes’ image rights; and persuading global Olympic sponsor Visa to come on board as Team 2012’s ‘Presenting Partner’ for £10m to start the fundraising.

3. Visa: sponsorship – or patronage?

I use the term ‘fundraising’ advisedly. Team 2012 is unashamedly a fundraising initiative designed to dent the shortfall in our Olympic sports’ budgets for London 2012, and increase Team GB’s chances of success: the official press release talks of nothing else. In which case, is Visa’s role more about patronage (financial aid with little or no expectation of ROI) rather than sponsorship (a win-win marketing partnership)? Don’t misunderstand me: I wish Team 2012 and Visa the best of British. But getting a meaningful return from this particular £10m investment looks like a big ask.

4. Sponsorship is not the only answer to the budget problem

A month after Andy Burnham’s original Medal Hopes announcement, I began advocating that any replacement programme should also incorporate innovative non-sponsorship fundraising models that had evolved elsewhere, such as Team Business West Midlands and the Vancouver 2010 Patron’s Programme. It’s good to see that this approach has been built into Team 2012, in the shape of the SME Club and the Official Donor programme.

By Tim Crow on October 7th, 2009

Tags: DCMS, Default, London 2012, London 2012 sponsorship, London 2012 sponsorship consultants, Olympic sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship consultants, Synergy, Team GB

No comments

So, after a long day of presentations and voting, Rio has won the right to host the first ever Olympic Games in South America. It’s fourth time lucky for the continent in bidding to host the Games, but what a party Rio 2016 promises to be.

With the theme of  ‘Live your passion’, Rio will introduce a very different type of dialogue between the Games and youth (integrating music, entertainment and ambience), an important factor for the IOC who are acutely conscious that the global Olympic audience is ageing.

With due respect to Chicago, Madrid and Tokyo, Rio clearly offered the most spectacular backdrop for the Olympic Games of the four competing cities, as well as the unique emotion, passion and creativity of the Brazilian nation.

In addition, Rio offers world-class facilities, an early legacy use for the venues of the 2014 FIFA World Cup and a model where only 26% of the venues need to be new builds.

Looking at the four bids, it’s also interesting to see that at $313m, Rio’s forecast sponsorship revenue is a only quarter of the target planned by Chicago. An unfair comparison? Over-optimism by Chicago? Or a case of ‘under promise, over deliver’ on Rio’s part? Only time will tell, but we shouldn’t underestimate the economic power – and lure – of one of the world’s biggest economies.

All in all, one can only applaud the IOC’s decision: it’s the right time for Rio, for Brazil, and for South America.

By Tom Gladstone on October 2nd, 2009

Tags: Olympic sponsorship, Olympics, Sponsorship

No comments

Well, we know it will be Chicago, Madrid, Rio or Tokyo. But we’ll have to wait until around 1800 GMT today to find out which one Jacques Rogge will announce as the host city of the 2016 Olympic Games.

The great and the good are gathering in Copenhagen for the 121st IOC Session where the main point on the agenda is the announcement of the winning bid. Pre-race favourite is Chicago, where the high-powered campaign has delivered the Obama factor – Michelle is in Denmark already, Barack is due to fly in today.  However, coming up closely on the inside is Rio, whose bid is focusing on the romantic appeal of being the first South American city to host an Olympic Games, and promising to bring the party to life by delivering the carnival atmosphere that everyone associates with Brazil. So, it certainly isn’t a one-horse race, and we shouldn’t forget that London wasn’t the favourite in the race for 2012.

Influential IOC member Dick Pound commented yesterday that the IOC will be looking for the ‘safest option’ for the winning city – in terms of secure finances, a strong infrastructure, security and the general ability to deliver a successful Games.  However, I don’t think that anyone can actually predict which city will be unveiled.

Whoever it is, it will be a momentous occasion. Remember the images from July 2005 when London was victorious – Denise Lewis and David Beckham jumping up and down in Singapore, Prime Minister, Tony Blair, apparently doing a little jig, and thousands of supporters celebrating in Trafalgar Square. For the winning bid it will be a day to remember and one that will change the city forever.

London celebrates winning the 2012 bid

Who do I think will be awarded the Games?  My head says Chicago, offering strong political and commercial opportunities for the IOC.  However, my heart is pulling on the appeal of the South American party capital and the lure of the carnival atmosphere that would create a Games unlike any other.  Unfortunately, I don’t get to vote, so the question is, what will appeal most to the IOC members – those that do get to decide?  We’ll just have to wait and see….

By Sara Wilson on October 2nd, 2009

Tags: David Beckham, Olympic sponsorship, Olympic sponsorship consultants, Olympics, Synergy

No comments

Synergy’s Caroline Ayling features in PR Week playing table football ahead of the Manchester derby.  To read the full article click here

By Synergy on October 1st, 2009

Tags: Press Clipping

No comments